From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Marco Costalba" Subject: Re: [StGIT RFC PATCH] Don't use refs/bases/ Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 13:17:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20070429220832.5832.251.stgit@yoghurt> <20070501185615.GA32727@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> <20070502065054.GA9919@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "Catalin Marinas" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Karl_Hasselstr=F6m?=" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 02 13:17:25 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HjCpp-00067s-F5 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 13:17:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751052AbXEBLRG convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 07:17:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2993048AbXEBLRG (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 07:17:06 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.236]:60141 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751052AbXEBLRD convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 07:17:03 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 76so96138wra for ; Wed, 02 May 2007 04:17:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YjUEaAnAvwv+/iFR2psjmUwLFIRFK5smbAR4CT2kH6I6scbLGioOpqwgEYDGFJZP9wDyGf4TZoLPlSKEBgItFiPKu9Y/JpiKhnSyZDz8cqH0It/9T4FkbTEhUGte8LHy19VO37AgUzwzLXytt/+acnd9Bk2fEguBcqq4WK7bI0s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QZMD39lfZqXYLY4YlBEpPd/NEyi/OjUYK+uoYEvtvUWiP1VglVslQ4WGY3pD5ynHuBE2BLxc5nbYXej3QMsaLRiDseIi7FDXZ2qVOGOkVSiAeeVur/9klxNlFl6sio3a3VpFwTEiiuSivqsAggFIz9cEHGUlfNKfchWe/sCn5Fw= Received: by 10.115.60.1 with SMTP id n1mr185210wak.1178104621871; Wed, 02 May 2007 04:17:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.61.6 with HTTP; Wed, 2 May 2007 04:17:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20070502065054.GA9919@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 5/2/07, Karl Hasselstr=F6m wrote: > > It's not near the top of my kill list by any stretch of the > imagination, so no need to worry. And even if it were, Catalin would > certainly stand as a wall of sanity between qgit and my chain saw. :-= ) > Currently I check for the existence of /patches directory as a quick exit in case a repository does NOT have a StGIT repo on it (the common case). This avoids a costly and 99% of cases not needed 'stg ' call= =2E I ask if it will be still a safe check in the long period or it is better to change the check to something else (as existence of /refs/patches) instead ? Thanks Marco