From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Marco Costalba" Subject: Re: If you would write git from scratch now, what would you change? Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:15:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200711252248.27904.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Andy Parkins" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 27 14:15:46 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ix0Hu-0000xm-Jw for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:15:43 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754234AbXK0NPX (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:15:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751741AbXK0NPX (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:15:23 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.184]:50192 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751821AbXK0NPW (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:15:22 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so877069rvb for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:15:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=2+K/z0mo3JgFMpo1N4XwuuS2TR1iBYsKDA846BNyio4=; b=pynbai8NkIniSUU431euqsfpYlsJ70fPxlRDKNHo+uI077Av/fDvcqCZYRpLNt2uvLUbsd0ed2SEA1j2/qH6qOnB2xeSiDhi7e5JpU7hn0m/nSlwHrDYVdE6dqFQEjLUNqzBQuMCRXzvpjH+g3Ir43RnbdMJFJJc3uw2q4/m+FI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UmK3V/2lh7mNf7pFetnylFkJJdzF6Dt4z1DKXeWY5Ob1CVG2OYHcKbXx6TZexd0nCz42dtS0jqZ69p3rHQrj6duij0oX4RJ77th8F6vBpyKwcv+wDz+PGAs1ZzEC5CR/WorMP7ZanQvqMK5MjfnJs/+spSfDt2Qa8/kd6BnlVAw= Received: by 10.140.164.1 with SMTP id m1mr1859723rve.1196169321788; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:15:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.76.1 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:15:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Nov 27, 2007 9:45 AM, Andy Parkins wrote: > Marco Costalba wrote: > > > But...wait...Qt would require...(I'm scared to say!)... that awful, > > painful, hopeless thing called C++. Probably you didn't mean what you > > said ;-) > > Actually although I like C++, that's not the reason, the reason is that Qt > is a significantly (IMHO) better toolkit than Tk. It's more cross platform > and looks a lot nicer. The fact that it's C++ is neither here nor there. > Actually there exist a Python bindings for Qt if you prefer. I was just joking about C++, never meant to start a "language war" that I personally consider as very very un-useful and very pity. Marco