From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Marco Costalba" Subject: Re: In future, to replace autotools by cmake like KDE4 did? Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:10:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <998d0e4a0712061810k18e6388jde9d7bc5bd006b57@mail.gmail.com> <47594021.40200@op5.se> <200712071456.11019.jnareb@gmail.com> <998d0e4a0712070642u6ae75232t9cb5bfd0920b2439@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Jakub Narebski" , "Andreas Ericsson" , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, git@vger.kernel.org, "David Miller" , "Daniel Berlin" , "Ismail Donmez" , "Marcel Holtmann" To: "J.C. Pizarro" X-From: gcc-return-142806-gcc=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Dec 07 17:11:17 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcc@gmane.org Received: from sourceware.org ([209.132.176.174]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J0fnI-0002vy-AZ for gcc@gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:11:16 +0100 Received: (qmail 27701 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2007 16:10:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 27693 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2007 16:10:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (HELO rv-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.198.191) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:10:53 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so677696rvb for ; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 08:10:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.132.8 with SMTP id j8mr2746184rvn.1197043851165; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 08:10:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.76.1 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Dec 2007 08:10:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <998d0e4a0712070642u6ae75232t9cb5bfd0920b2439@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc@gcc.gnu.org Archived-At: On Dec 7, 2007 3:42 PM, J.C. Pizarro wrote: > > A powerful tool can do better things that old generators-based tools > (as autotools). > --- cut --- > > * Later: (with the powerful tool that had cached many predefined variables in Insisting on highlighting your proposal as "powerful tool" vs what is in git now (on which people spent long hours to tune it out) will give you hard times on this list ;-) Just my guess... Marco