From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Marco Costalba" Subject: Re: [PATCH WIP] sha1-lookup: make selection of 'middle' less aggressive Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:04:19 +0100 Message-ID: References: <7vd4soa3cw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vtzm08l9w.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vodc77t0o.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Linus Torvalds" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Junio C Hamano" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Dec 30 23:05:59 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J96HO-0005W3-0C for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:05:38 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758070AbXL3WEV (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:04:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758061AbXL3WEV (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:04:21 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.187]:48810 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757536AbXL3WEU (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:04:20 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so4316233rvb.1 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:04:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=XoKzV3osmUeaEUPXhyKT931dxjKuAULp7AbpQ7ZkFo8=; b=vU9QEoXjSDR2Bs73Ogp17wHzgVJnsOFClJnXqiOq04Ek1YHyNXFsDrdKjwyGUjyUdW2zBq3EF/Q2t/OlXwPBv/DNSvjjmUzcK8OdSyw3SACbcCeBFxpyRozHHs5D09du37JbW7b5cpm2DgXfasbPWgg0JZfJqDSORSdpHso3LPA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kIaEyG1n4Q9L7ouVjHolS/XXg/Ti571JWRk1vgu7yvi82wMd4Qg9sF0OWEHT39AGoKrQ35o9u9o3L2lZnwNmafFNZUQFu9maO7c5OW/u0nFtOrhPR+syM739gqznQ2avD/3/hrNL9vS3+Sa/nGJhblUummC+0IoNHB8mR2g/Bx8= Received: by 10.140.173.15 with SMTP id v15mr6023255rve.218.1199052259778; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:04:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.76.1 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:04:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7vodc77t0o.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Dec 30, 2007 10:49 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Linus Torvalds writes: > > > The cost of the key comparison done in each round is > insignificant compared to the actual cost of accessing the > object data through zlib. Sorry to ask, but just out of curiosity, what were the reasons to choose zlib compression algorithm among the possible ones? There is a thread where this has been discussed in the past? Sorry to ask but I didn't find such a thread myself. Thanks Marco