From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Marco Costalba" Subject: Re: [PATCH WIP] sha1-lookup: make selection of 'middle' less aggressive Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 00:47:47 +0100 Message-ID: References: <7vd4soa3cw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vtzm08l9w.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vodc77t0o.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Junio C Hamano" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Linus Torvalds" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 01 00:48:17 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J9UMj-0007kR-2l for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:48:17 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751776AbXLaXru (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:47:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751590AbXLaXru (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:47:50 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.186]:63929 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751406AbXLaXrt (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:47:49 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so4733525rvb.1 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 15:47:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=0A2qs9w4X6wKw03n6hL/I7TwbtaREjF0glhKcT1XRMA=; b=wqhigpOsC3XUwV3zs9Gzzeg+2sfTcx98hi3KJPyXeRVKr8BU5nVVm7R0pRWHqpwNY/Si8LK06yWSFHqEF04abUFDPQMovcK3PjjwRtegkwfBFTY4rv2hMx3L352c0wmjjqiwRJMOi/UThoGWj6fihTx5/apkVLe9tbsF8TancT8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Vv8d9gihSZ+IPFrTR6Xarx+9cv5JpQg8Qk/L2mF2qeLk6AWP9pxs0QGEAvhZx0lTx5qWgV8biKKkQSDpSz0PYDzW7VtPYlf6OdPhlzp7jOsxWVbJZENKGjY0s49PwZpxo4/m6bjuBjRPkkXDX+a8DDlJYeHPR0rmquV/q4p6xXk= Received: by 10.141.129.14 with SMTP id g14mr6176916rvn.209.1199144867911; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 15:47:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.76.1 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 15:47:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Dec 31, 2007 9:37 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Even today, I don't really know of a better compression choice, despite > now being more aware of how critical uncompression performance is. > In the kernel, from not long ago, is used also LZO compression that _seems_ much faster to decompress then zlib http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/1/297 The developer, Richard Purdie, says it's also 40% faster to read for jffs2. > > Quite possibly, the cache miss costs dominate over any algorithmic costs. > What way could be used to build up a test to check this? Thanks Marco