From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Marco Costalba" Subject: Re: Decompression speed: zip vs lzo Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:51:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: <7v4pdmfw27.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <47855765.9090001@vilain.net> <47856E8D.4010006@vilain.net> <4785A6DB.3080007@vilain.net> <20080110091607.GA17944@artemis.madism.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Pierre Habouzit" , "Sam Vilain" , "Git Mailing List" , "Johannes Schindelin" , "Junio C Hamano" To: "Nicolas Pitre" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 10 22:51:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JD5JK-0007d6-6G for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:51:38 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752993AbYAJVvK (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:51:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752373AbYAJVvJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:51:09 -0500 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.181]:20119 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751260AbYAJVvG (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:51:06 -0500 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so1249696pyb.10 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:51:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=xYfzkDGfH9KgMjho1kOePYDRuHqDuivyKk04n3TyLcA=; b=W2IgP6IR/P7epAhvs4vpD4wvdK+5mRi4S9X5gm6ur1LVHOA5a8qR4+WU0rlhYxennI3NrAVaySRoZJvGUiJHXCj8Ohkak3DCjlBJ9gtIQYGvCh5rJkn1anZNIhzN5S4hYp3oJ2wQfDJ4bA1ifi7YIGWm45dTogR24dxAS7Z3nNI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DVvHJzDhVJq5BS3uNz0zVQ0r4+bb+QzQ0f2wylFJ7ob3bHb08XjJsyRBbiMm60oq+Qg4T8fTTwYOcun8tDBZmXd6IWXLtyMSM6yV/tW5LZ1sLyo87GjSYMp06kUImJNy3GpEq44PTemPyWp6ntV8en9d+/20V7aquV10BqAFGzQ= Received: by 10.140.199.19 with SMTP id w19mr1537797rvf.104.1200001864566; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:51:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.76.1 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:51:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Jan 10, 2008 9:39 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Right. Abstracting the zlib code and having different compression > algorithms tested in the Git context is the only way to do meaningful > comparisons. > The first thing I would like to test when zlib abstraction is ready is to test with NULL compressor, i.e. not compression/decompression at all and see if 'git log' and friends are happy. BTW would be possible to test git with zlib disabled also now? I mean there is a quick hack to disable zlib not only in writing but also in reading, so that we can see what happens when running a repository packed without compression? Thanks Marco