From: "Marco Costalba" <mcostalba@gmail.com>
To: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Time to flush developer accumulated patches?
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:10:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e5bfff550801200210y212d0921x214773596810be52@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Reading mailing list threads it is becoming common these days to hear
about contributors with patches ready to be sent as soon as 1.5.4 is
out.
Would be a good idea to open a new branch new_stuff as a target for
this pending stuff?
I understand that you want people focused on fixing bugs, but I also
understand that people don't ;-)
Opening a new_stuff branch could have the following benefits:
- Give more time to fix bugs before 1.5.4 is out without stopping
people from having fun and reduce the pressure to release.
- Reduce the merging impact when master reopens because patches are
already merged in new_stuff and developers have already taken care of
conflicts
- Do not slow down the wheel: I can develop some patches and keep them
myself, but until are not discussed in the list and eventually got in
master has little meaning to continue develop additional stuff.
- Perhaps it's lack of reviewing time on your side that worries you
(as is normal because we are on bug fixes mode in master) but upgrade
from new_stuff to master would be not automatic nor guaranteed but at
least people have an idea at what's going on and can keep contributing
in code and ideas.
Comments?
Marco
next reply other threads:[~2008-01-20 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-20 10:10 Marco Costalba [this message]
2008-01-20 10:18 ` Time to flush developer accumulated patches? Wincent Colaiuta
2008-01-20 10:24 ` Marco Costalba
2008-01-20 10:47 ` Steffen Prohaska
2008-01-20 13:49 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-20 20:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-21 11:15 ` Time to flush Mr. Hammano? Quim K Holland
2008-01-21 11:36 ` David Kastrup
2008-01-21 11:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-21 11:47 ` Imran M Yousuf
2008-01-21 11:38 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-01-21 11:39 ` Juanma Barranquero
2008-01-21 12:26 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-21 13:18 ` Rogan Dawes
2008-01-21 14:12 ` David Tweed
2008-01-21 18:07 ` Marco Costalba
2008-01-21 19:13 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e5bfff550801200210y212d0921x214773596810be52@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mcostalba@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).