From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Marco Costalba" Subject: Re: [RFC] repack vs re-clone Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:20:09 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "git mailing list" To: "Jakub Narebski" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 11 20:20:52 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JOeCv-0007DQ-6e for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:20:49 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755563AbYBKTUP (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:20:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753645AbYBKTUP (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:20:15 -0500 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.232]:21569 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752178AbYBKTUN (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:20:13 -0500 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h31so4877986wxd.4 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:20:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=2gO2sZUMP9qiRjl/95IbISy/1FGcZnWZZa1ujpMmMRw=; b=IwUMTS1EsHaj3bDgYw61axaS9huloAioOCLRt38QutAcCQbWo8481dQxA9KC+wkKumy5OMNjEzHLl3NZd4yTz7jOPiSbwslL3OSrRYy9LE0FyXqEU8FECtoUSSto9LMuJdgVlZKvYFNLme4D6o9pquqwHLHzxx9WGp93neOZ0Ck= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=s4iLgX0t7Nh+b8e4qPNbBMCfCZGXH8AK6u6ih5BNVE0ctxirO5FDnx7L9D3wybyCuI/ACTFeGAanlx8HxDsI2T7vqEJXV7SBLh/SttnTXwsvYi818zV/gkILUIgzzhh54BA5jQlwG5jPQ256T09h2+Luo1qThEekm45wWVCcyt4= Received: by 10.140.142.6 with SMTP id p6mr236120rvd.224.1202757609723; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:20:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.76.1 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:20:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Feb 11, 2008 7:45 PM, Jakub Narebski wrote: > "Marco Costalba" writes: > > > So it happens to be just faster to re-clone the whole thing by upstream. > > So what you are doing is passing the work, unnecessary work I'd say, > to some poor server. Not nice. > To a poor net bandwidth I would say because cloning from zero just downloads the packages.