Re: git on Cygwin: Not a valid object name HEAD

["Torgil Svensson" <torgil.svensson@gmail.com>]

On 8/11/07, Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de> wrote:

> >>  [..list of tools and links]
> >
> > Thank you for the information!  i'll check those up.
>
>
> I hope to have an improved list on monday, sorted by priority of
> the developers I'm working with.
>
> I thought I do some coding, to find out a bit more about the
> stability of msysgit. So I started and added support for kdiff3
> on Windows (see patches in separate mail).

neat.The hardest part for me was to find out that I didn't have to
configure anything or add a command line option to get kdiff3 running.
(I cheated looking in the source, I think we should add #ifdef
__MINGW32__ / #endif around the registry reading part.

Good job!




> I'm impressed. Pretty much everything I tried today worked for
> me. After I got git gui running, and learned how to avoid pitfalls
> of git submodule, development went smoothly. I pushed and pulled a
> bit from linux and mac and did some coding. Thanks for the vim
> setup!
>
> I think you (and more people I don't yet know) did a great job
> with msysgit. I'd recommend it over cygwin's git, which caused
> some trouble for me.

Thanks. I'm as fresh as you in msysgit development but it is quite
straightforward. I've fiddled around with cygwin/msys before but now I
think we're on to something useful.


> > What do you include in the "make windist" installer and the "Windows
> > support" ?  Are you talking porcelain or plumbing?
>
> Hard to say. I believe now, from what I learned today, that the msysgit
> approach is quite reasonable: Grouping all needed unix tools around a
> submodule containing git. But the submodule should be git.git. I think
> this is what I'd expect. I like the idea of bringing everything needed
> along, and keeping it separate from the rest of the system. This avoids
> conflicts with, for example, cygwin.


> I don't think I would expect much more for a basic setup. All tests
> should run, maybe some msysgit tests would be needed to test the
> pitfalls

I'm lacking several things. Many usability-glitches, some bugs, easy
access to documentation. Also we want to integrate the mingw git parts
into git.git so people can follow the official repo. etc..

> I didn't like the submodule problems I ran into and I still didn't find
> out how to push to the git mob branch.

This is weird. I haven't had such problems with this (dirty submodule
in working dir), but that probably is because the supermodule doesn't
depend on files in the submodule [submodule "make install" copies
files to the supermodule]. Otherwise we should be more dependent on a
clean submodule state.  I would though expect a "git reset --hard" to
fix up the submodule for me.


> [ many proposals for future work with msysgit]

Yeah. there's plenty of stuff to do. You could add this stuff to the
issue tracker Dimitry has initiated.

//Torgil