From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Anand Kumria" Subject: Re: On boolean configuration variables... Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 13:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <7vy7vmviul.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jun 25 15:33:41 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FuUk7-0003PC-9y for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2006 15:33:39 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750902AbWFYNde (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jun 2006 09:33:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750899AbWFYNde (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jun 2006 09:33:34 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:53125 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750790AbWFYNde (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jun 2006 09:33:34 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FuUk0-0003P1-Fd for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2006 15:33:32 +0200 Received: from mail.globalcapital.cc ([80.85.66.210]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Jun 2006 15:33:32 +0200 Received: from wildfire by mail.globalcapital.cc with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Jun 2006 15:33:32 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: mail.globalcapital.cc User-Agent: pan 0.98 ("The plain old chaos of undifferentiated weirdness.") Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 05:28:02 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Boolean configuration variables in $GIT_DIR/config are a bit > strange. > > [bool] > var1 > var2 = > var3 = true > var4 = yes > var5 = 1 > var6 = 2 > var7 = false > var8 = no > var9 = 0 > > var1, var3, var5, and var6 are "true"; var2, var7 and var9 are > "false". var4 and var8 are syntax errors. > > Currently "git repo-config --bool --get bool.var1" returns > "false", which is fixed by the attached patch, but I am > wondering if it is a good idea to allow "yes" and "no" as well. > Allowing 'yes' and 'no' to equal 'true' and 'false' respectively sounds pretty sane and user-friendly. Why wouldn't you want to do that? Anand