* Strange output of 'git diff <revision1>:<file> <revision2>:<file>'
@ 2006-07-15 10:20 Jakub Narebski
2006-07-15 12:56 ` [PATCH] use the path as name from the revision:path syntax in setup_revisions Matthias Lederhofer
2006-07-15 12:59 ` [PATCH] array index mixup Matthias Lederhofer
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Narebski @ 2006-07-15 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
git diff output for files specified by revision is somewhat unexpected.
$ git diff <revision_1>:<file> <revision_2>:<file>
outputs the following diff metainfo
diff --git a/<revision_2>:<file> b/<revision_2>:<file>
index 5eabe06..2e87de4 100644
--- a/<revision_2>:<file>
+++ b/<revision_2>:<file>
Is it intended, or is it a bug? Looks like a bug to me...
git 1.4.0 (git-core-1.4.0-1.fc4 by Fedora Project).
--
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] use the path as name from the revision:path syntax in setup_revisions
2006-07-15 10:20 Strange output of 'git diff <revision1>:<file> <revision2>:<file>' Jakub Narebski
@ 2006-07-15 12:56 ` Matthias Lederhofer
2006-07-15 12:59 ` [PATCH] array index mixup Matthias Lederhofer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Lederhofer @ 2006-07-15 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Narebski; +Cc: git
---
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
> git diff output for files specified by revision is somewhat unexpected.
>
> $ git diff <revision_1>:<file> <revision_2>:<file>
>
> outputs the following diff metainfo
>
> diff --git a/<revision_2>:<file> b/<revision_2>:<file>
> index 5eabe06..2e87de4 100644
> --- a/<revision_2>:<file>
> +++ b/<revision_2>:<file>
>
> Is it intended, or is it a bug? Looks like a bug to me...
I guess the revision should not be there. Here is a patch to remove
it.
<matled> is there a name for 'revision:path' to specify a file at a
certain revision?
<jdl> "That weird syntax, you know."
<matled> get_path_out_of_the_weird_syntax(const char *s)
<matled> you know :)
<jdl> That should do it!
Could someone please come up with a nice name for the function?
Without knowing a name for the '<revision>:<path>' syntax I can only
think of get_path or similar names and this is much too generic imo.
---
cache.h | 1 +
revision.c | 2 ++
sha1_name.c | 12 ++++++++++++
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
index d433d46..7da1c5c 100644
--- a/cache.h
+++ b/cache.h
@@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ #define DEFAULT_ABBREV 7
extern int get_sha1(const char *str, unsigned char *sha1);
extern int get_sha1_hex(const char *hex, unsigned char *sha1);
+extern char *get_path_out_of_the_weird_syntax(const char *str);
extern char *sha1_to_hex(const unsigned char *sha1); /* static buffer result! */
extern int read_ref(const char *filename, unsigned char *sha1);
extern const char *resolve_ref(const char *path, unsigned char *sha1, int);
diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
index 874e349..fbd1458 100644
--- a/revision.c
+++ b/revision.c
@@ -908,6 +908,8 @@ int setup_revisions(int argc, const char
if (!seen_dashdash)
verify_non_filename(revs->prefix, arg);
object = get_reference(revs, arg, sha1, flags ^ local_flags);
+ if (object->type == OBJ_BLOB || object->type == OBJ_TREE)
+ arg = get_path_out_of_the_weird_syntax(arg);
add_pending_object(revs, object, arg);
}
if (show_merge)
diff --git a/sha1_name.c b/sha1_name.c
index 5fe8e5d..718ce1b 100644
--- a/sha1_name.c
+++ b/sha1_name.c
@@ -543,3 +543,15 @@ int get_sha1(const char *name, unsigned
}
return ret;
}
+
+/* get the path from sha1:path, :path and :[0-3]:path */
+char *get_path_out_of_the_weird_syntax(const char *str)
+{
+ if (strlen(str) >= 3 &&
+ str[0] == ':' && str[2] == ':' &&
+ str[1] >= '0' && str[2] <= '3')
+ return((char*)(str+3));
+ if (index(str, ':'))
+ return index(str, ':')+1;
+ return str;
+}
--
1.4.1.ga3e6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] array index mixup
2006-07-15 10:20 Strange output of 'git diff <revision1>:<file> <revision2>:<file>' Jakub Narebski
2006-07-15 12:56 ` [PATCH] use the path as name from the revision:path syntax in setup_revisions Matthias Lederhofer
@ 2006-07-15 12:59 ` Matthias Lederhofer
2006-07-16 8:50 ` Junio C Hamano
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Lederhofer @ 2006-07-15 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: git, Jakub Narebski
---
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
> git diff output for files specified by revision is somewhat unexpected.
>
> $ git diff <revision_1>:<file> <revision_2>:<file>
>
> outputs the following diff metainfo
>
> diff --git a/<revision_2>:<file> b/<revision_2>:<file>
> index 5eabe06..2e87de4 100644
> --- a/<revision_2>:<file>
> +++ b/<revision_2>:<file>
>
> Is it intended, or is it a bug? Looks like a bug to me...
I dunno if this is really an index mixup or was intended. If this is
intended please add a comment what it's for. (Without this you get
rename information, perhaps this is the reason.)
---
builtin-diff.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin-diff.c b/builtin-diff.c
index cb38f44..4d43a5c 100644
--- a/builtin-diff.c
+++ b/builtin-diff.c
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static int builtin_diff_blobs(struct rev
stuff_change(&revs->diffopt,
mode, mode,
blob[1].sha1, blob[0].sha1,
- blob[0].name, blob[0].name);
+ blob[1].name, blob[0].name);
diffcore_std(&revs->diffopt);
diff_flush(&revs->diffopt);
return 0;
--
1.4.1.ga3e6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] array index mixup
2006-07-15 12:59 ` [PATCH] array index mixup Matthias Lederhofer
@ 2006-07-16 8:50 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2006-07-16 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthias Lederhofer; +Cc: git, Jakub Narebski
Matthias Lederhofer <matled@gmx.net> writes:
> I dunno if this is really an index mixup or was intended. If this is
> intended please add a comment what it's for. (Without this you get
> rename information, perhaps this is the reason.)
That is exactly the reason -- it was a temporary workaround
which nobody noticed so far.
The right fix would involve updating diff_resolve_rename_copy so
that it does not rely on the comparison of path names (that
means DIFF_PAIR_RENAME() macro needs to change), and instead
mark the pairs synthesized in diffcore-rename as such, and use
that to tell if a pair is a result of rename/copy [*1*].
Your other patch (not the one to change the index of the array
used for labels, but the one that extracts the pathname out of
the syntax to name a blob by path in an arbitrary tree object)
could be safely applied when that happens.
[Footnote]
*1* If somebody wants to do this, one thing to watch out for is
matching up of broken pairs. If a pair originally broken by
diffcore-break (because they were dissimilar enough according to
the option given to -B flag) are merged into one by
diffcore-rename (because they were similar enough according to
the option given to -M flag), we should _not_ say the resulting
pair is renamed. In general, the threashold for breaking should
be lower than diffcore-rename to merge them for a sane use, so
this might be a non-issue in practice, though.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-07-16 8:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-07-15 10:20 Strange output of 'git diff <revision1>:<file> <revision2>:<file>' Jakub Narebski
2006-07-15 12:56 ` [PATCH] use the path as name from the revision:path syntax in setup_revisions Matthias Lederhofer
2006-07-15 12:59 ` [PATCH] array index mixup Matthias Lederhofer
2006-07-16 8:50 ` Junio C Hamano
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).