From: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org, GGG <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: "D. Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble@gmail.com>, "Julia Evans" <julia@jvns.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] doc: use `man git` to teach users how to navigate the docs
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 08:06:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea29fe74-7f76-440c-9597-fdbc173be90f@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.2242.v2.git.1791317163584.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 6, 2026, at 22:06, Julia Evans via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
>
> Many existing users of Git don't know how Git's documentation is
> structured, and a lot of folks have expressed frustration that `man git`
> doesn't make it easy to find out how to get help with using Git.
Yeah I can imagine.
>
> Explain how Git's help system works in `man git`
> (`git push -h` gives a short help, `git push --help` is the full docs),
> since it's a slightly unusual approach.
I recall only relatively recently learning that `-h` is not just a
shorter way to type `--help`.
> Remove the references to gittutorial and giteveryday since they're
> unlikely to help new users learn Git. Currently they feel very
> aspirational (it would be nice to have a tutorial and a guide to
> everyday Git commands!), but we should give users a realistic view of
> what the documentation actually provides.
Right, aspirations are not good enough when it comes to the bread and
butter everyday howtos.
> Mention `git help` instead of `giteveryday` for now, which does a better
> job of giving an overview of everyday commands.
>
> Also mention `git help --guides` and `git help --user-interfaces`,
> since those parts of the documentation are useful and hard to discover.
>
> Do not mention `git help --developer-interfaces` since it's not relevant
> to users.
Okay, so now we don’t have to list out every guide that might be of
interest. That’s cool.
I see that this would conflict with my topic
kh/doc-gitbreaking-changes7.[1] Just would since my topic hasn’t
been integrated yet (RFC). I use the old style of mentioning the
new gitbreaking-changes(7) (“see <here> for ...”. I will remove
that change in order to stay consistent with this topic.
🔗 1: https://lore.kernel.org/git/CV_gitbrchanges7_please.d1c@m5gid.xyz/
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
> ---
> [doc] Use man git to teach users how to navigate the docs
>
> Changes in v2:
>
> * mention the git help push form too
> * mention you can get HTML docs with git help --web push at the end to
> advertise git help's great features, and remove
> https://git.github.io/htmldocs/git.html since
> https://git-scm.com/docs has a nicer view and 3 different options is
> a lot.
Nitpick: Okay, but with the current commit message I don’t really
understand why the git.github.io link is gone. I have to guess that it
is an effective duplicate of git-scm or something since git-scm does
remain after this change.
> * some minor wording changes
> * fix commit message style (doc: not [doc])
>
>[snip]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 20:32 [PATCH] [doc] Use `man git` to teach users how to navigate the docs Julia Evans via GitGitGadget
2026-09-28 21:02 ` Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 2:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-29 11:29 ` Julia Evans
2026-09-29 19:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-29 21:00 ` Julia Evans
2026-09-29 21:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-06 20:06 ` [PATCH v2] doc: use " Julia Evans via GitGitGadget
2026-10-06 20:23 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-10-07 6:06 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk [this message]
2026-10-07 12:13 ` Julia Evans
2026-10-07 13:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-07 13:57 ` Julia Evans
2026-10-07 17:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-07 19:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-07 19:29 ` Julia Evans
2026-10-07 20:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-08 15:09 ` Julia Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea29fe74-7f76-440c-9597-fdbc173be90f@app.fastmail.com \
--to=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
--cc=ben.knoble@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=julia@jvns.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox