From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: gitweb testing with non-apache web server Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:37:39 +0200 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <20060803075403.GA5238@buici.com> <20060803153403.GA30729@buici.com> <7vfygdr888.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Aug 03 20:38:13 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8i4r-0007D4-BM for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:37:49 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030187AbWHCShq (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:37:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030194AbWHCShq (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:37:46 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:17840 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030187AbWHCShp (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:37:45 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1G8i4Y-00077j-N9 for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:37:30 +0200 Received: from host-81-190-31-92.torun.mm.pl ([81.190.31.92]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:37:30 +0200 Received: from jnareb by host-81-190-31-92.torun.mm.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:37:30 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-81-190-31-92.torun.mm.pl Mail-Copies-To: jnareb@gmail.com User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jakub Narebski writes: > >> >> Strange... PATH_INFO is used _only_ if 'p' parameter is not set. And all >> links use 'p=$project', not PATH_INFO... >> >> Are you sure you did changes mentioned in earlier post? > > Well, more importantly, why would we do something like this in the first > place? > > Wouldn't it be a lot better to just rip out PATH_INFO stuff, > especially since all pages the script generates use ?p=$project > to pass that information around and never uses PATH_INFO? The PATH_INFO is here because it is easier to edit parameters by hand when the most important one, the project to examine, can be passed as PATH_INFO. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git