From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] clean-ups of static functions and returns Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:22:36 +0200 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 14 23:22:42 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GCjtP-0001Zx-Dq for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:22:39 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964958AbWHNVW0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:22:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964953AbWHNVW0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:22:26 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:24769 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964955AbWHNVWY (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:22:24 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GCjsr-0001SK-So for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:22:05 +0200 Received: from host-81-190-23-158.torun.mm.pl ([81.190.23.158]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:22:05 +0200 Received: from jnareb by host-81-190-23-158.torun.mm.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:22:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-81-190-23-158.torun.mm.pl Mail-Copies-To: jnareb@gmail.com User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, David Rientjes wrote: > >> On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Jakub Narebski wrote: >> > Could you please make description of patch series email to be parent >> > (ancestor) of all patches emails, i.e. for patches either to be >> > chain-replied to introduction email, or all be replies to introduction >> > email. >> > >> > It makes for easier reading/viewing/applying/ignoring the series. >> > >> >> Sure, but you might also want to include this request explicitly in >> Documentation/SubmittingPatches. > > Well... there are people (like yours truly), who still hack there mails in > pine, and who do not use git-send-email (I had too many problems with > Perl, and git-send-email _is_ in Perl)... For me, it would be an undue > burden. I also not always use git-send-email (because of the box connection to the net); mu latest series of patches was send using KMail; still it is not that hard to send patches as reply to introductory letter, or chain-replied; just reply-all (without quoting) from your "sent" folder. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git