From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: use common parameter parsing and generation for "o", too.
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 12:55:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec6qnp$aal$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20060818202013.GB30022@admingilde.org
Martin Waitz wrote:
> Perhaps introduce a new function which is used to access the parameters?
> This new function could check the URL or CGI->param or whatever and then
> return the requested value.
CGI->param. There is no reason to duplicate CGI module.
> Then the action functions could get all parameters they need, validate
> them themselves and then act on them.
> This would suit my "break out parameter parsing from actions" and your
> "validate parameters in the action function".
> (And I really interpret your sentence in such a way that you only want
> to move the _validation_, not the actual parsing (which is done inside
> CGI->param at the moment.)
Validation and accessing. Parsing via CGI->param.
There is another reason I want to move accessing and validation of
parameters to the "action" function (perhaps, as you suggested, via
"wrapper" function), namely removing some global variables. Perhaps it is
unnecessary, but I wonder how well that works with mod_perl. Other global
variables are configuration and do not change form execution to execution
of script...
--
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-19 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-16 22:28 [PATCH] gitweb: continue consolidation of URL generation Martin Waitz
2006-08-16 22:28 ` [PATCH] gitweb: use common parameter parsing and generation for "o", too Martin Waitz
2006-08-16 22:28 ` [PATCH] gitweb: support for "fp" parameter Martin Waitz
2006-08-16 22:28 ` [PATCH] gitweb: support for / as home_link Martin Waitz
2006-08-16 22:28 ` [PATCH] gitweb: fix project list if PATH_INFO=="/" Martin Waitz
2006-08-16 22:28 ` [PATCH] gitweb: use action dispatcher for non-project actions, too Martin Waitz
2006-08-17 2:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-08-17 15:00 ` Carl Worth
2006-08-18 13:16 ` Petr Baudis
2006-08-18 14:03 ` Carl Worth
2006-08-18 14:22 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-08-18 15:40 ` Petr Baudis
2006-08-17 19:43 ` Martin Waitz
2006-08-17 9:41 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-08-17 19:49 ` Martin Waitz
2006-08-17 20:00 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-08-17 9:35 ` [PATCH] gitweb: use common parameter parsing and generation for "o", too Jakub Narebski
2006-08-17 19:13 ` Martin Waitz
2006-08-17 19:34 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-08-18 20:20 ` Martin Waitz
2006-08-19 10:55 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2006-08-19 18:33 ` Martin Waitz
2006-08-19 21:44 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-08-17 1:59 ` [PATCH] gitweb: continue consolidation of URL generation Junio C Hamano
2006-08-17 19:32 ` Martin Waitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='ec6qnp$aal$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).