From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94DEFC48BDF for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 13:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7081561260 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 13:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232711AbhFRNNX (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:13:23 -0400 Received: from smtp.hosts.co.uk ([85.233.160.19]:56364 "EHLO smtp.hosts.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231167AbhFRNNX (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:13:23 -0400 Received: from host-78-147-180-220.as13285.net ([78.147.180.220] helo=[192.168.1.37]) by smtp.hosts.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim) (envelope-from ) id 1luEHA-0003uB-Fj; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:11:13 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Make CMake work out of the box To: Johannes Schindelin , Junio C Hamano Cc: Matthew Rogers via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sunshine , Sibi Siddharthan , Bagas Sanjaya , Matthew Rogers References: From: Philip Oakley Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:11:12 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 10/06/2021 10:45, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > As long as the CI builds pass, I am in favor of integrating the patch > series. > >> I did wonder if we want this to be applicable to the maintenance >> track for 2.31, though. There is a textual conflict with the >> addition of SIMPLE_IPC that happened during 2.32 cycle, which is >> easily resolvable. > If it isn't much work, sure. But I would think that developers who want to > build using Visual Studio really should stay on newer branches. Ack. Philip