From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Leo Razoumov" Subject: Re: more merge strategies : feature request Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 21:49:08 -0500 Message-ID: References: <81bfc67a0811290848m6cb219c0y71a7266001096f2d@mail.gmail.com> <4933AC03.6050300@op5.se> Reply-To: SLONIK.AZ@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Caleb Cushing" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Andreas Ericsson" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 02 03:50:37 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L7LLM-0008SG-Sj for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 03:50:33 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753936AbYLBCtM (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2008 21:49:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753857AbYLBCtM (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2008 21:49:12 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:34322 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753349AbYLBCtK (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2008 21:49:10 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so1990997fgg.17 for ; Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:49:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=PIP7Nexhp6QCaDr9Fd3CS8FONVR2r6DW0pkbk0H3/ew=; b=AOerNDHtBS/5WLQWj5njSWegjXyAdBeOW+dqfC6xtrFCr/PKXitQHeJdUBZNXpV0q+ EartUM/ub/oICjEOGUlkvtTu07FPoNTY15lSFNe2UBCI78LsoO5dHlk1ZAuHuLL8XWU+ Oxyp2d+CzD+oHAzRM+Us5rEF1InNnpM+Za/fo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:references; b=nhLrzCgx/nLdu7zhZiaJGDsxJUMVrFCE1r38yTqB8bvY5Rg7sCPIY7ix+WQA5LoBtG 1j76Gj10jGF7sgcZL59Mg+9kQrG6faQDdNK2tFhhsjPIWtRqNO6nM9S6PqhjcTL0BNwg Okp7pk8vfK9kcOMXEscc2PdBbnZxWVh2tlRRc= Received: by 10.181.159.17 with SMTP id l17mr4135042bko.14.1228186149031; Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:49:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.181.7.8 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 18:49:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4933AC03.6050300@op5.se> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 12/1/08, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > Caleb Cushing wrote: > > > conflict: this strategy would always resolve in a merge conflict > > allowing you to use git mergetool to piece the files back together. > > > > no-overwrite: if a change from the branch being merged in would > > overwrite something in the current branch don't merge it. (I think it > > needs a better name) > > I guess that "no-overwrite" can be achieved by git merge -s ours --no-commit --Leo--