From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Brandon Casey" Subject: Re: git gc & deleted branches Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 23:15:11 -0500 Message-ID: References: <48235D99.2040407@nrlssc.navy.mil> <48237344.6070405@nrlssc.navy.mil> <20080508214454.GA1939@sigill.intra.peff.net> <48237650.5060008@nrlssc.navy.mil> <20080508224827.GA2938@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vabj0b1re.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v1w4bb291.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Junio C Hamano" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat May 10 06:16:37 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JugVd-0003np-Rb for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 10 May 2008 06:16:34 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751153AbYEJEPO (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 May 2008 00:15:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751146AbYEJEPO (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 May 2008 00:15:14 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.158]:28443 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751139AbYEJEPM (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 May 2008 00:15:12 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so1042358fgg.17 for ; Fri, 09 May 2008 21:15:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=xaJ9PBt2HTfG0Jr1W5SA1VG+S7+ITfq9pw993YvvVpc=; b=BtRt0cLAkmRPDVktZKYQexf5BNpL7PljIo1DQnOM588zaYGLnxk1U2/KdwCjnbh8836t85wa7sHEIqHRy12i/uRPvqHZ0InSyKMdb0HcdtTIBjBwzCi3kQdqx0r4AUt9xwW3pUJyo98dTm2Ta6puds2sAAEd4oQ36lx3bhFFz6M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XWlss/Tz1vWNXtpVO0SM6wELEQ72/XeVl1NrM/LWdJJTYcMSmJ3o8KXMucB+gXerLk7G3bx/vBSNMSCSDiUOcq3YlIP1lWFTtkC2fBqnm5dNxlbnZCawUeExEnXP/pqtuz6EBs8D4mNMN4eyFs3XafU1qxxi1i3wpzOIBBr/pso= Received: by 10.86.98.18 with SMTP id v18mr9758044fgb.31.1210392911038; Fri, 09 May 2008 21:15:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.89.8 with HTTP; Fri, 9 May 2008 21:15:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Brandon Casey wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > The remainder of your email is below since the list has never seen it. > > >> Perhaps we would want a new option --eject that causes pack-object write >> out unreachable packed objects in the loose format? Two comments on this. 1) If you decide to go in this direction, I think the option should be named --unpack-unreachable rather than --eject. 2) There is some part of me that is against a program named pack-objects doing unpacking. But it is probably more efficient this way. -brandon