From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David Symonds" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rearrange git-format-patch synopsis to improve clarity. Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 09:56:36 +1100 Message-ID: References: <119421522591-git-send-email-dsymonds@gmail.com> <472F9DC6.8020607@op5.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Junio C Hamano" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Andreas Ericsson" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Nov 05 23:56:52 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IpAsF-0006ER-8v for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 23:56:51 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752700AbXKEW4i (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2007 17:56:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752045AbXKEW4i (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2007 17:56:38 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.189]:56536 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750830AbXKEW4h (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2007 17:56:37 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so1659142rvb for ; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:56:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=vxp5koSaJEBs/9/j7NSGCq5E9w/zDyZBmsb+jZ8Vb/M=; b=PSR0YBaBouGQb27gbpElXDRjPVhXa8i3hpbbuUwouyjPUsI9A4Gtl6XfUD5QfVFEx7fzFCFx7Lz71IzHl6xa6UDUd7b8I3378E3wz51yPK2fuHf1XpN7WHIUBFvafAZKppy+tGCkhaqll7tQ8MJJqpJiI6fDrc2x8nW87rlqosY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=i5/sBV8OoZxMIKBs1ZsbaZFK63pyzsS057spz8VInPp5hYWC72k9398xRTzKSOgpgZqRXkyMtRhNj2lSnJQsrFbr1VMwCvpkPRDlnSSOUH6/aw7CSozi6wD6s1u9NgEV2wHX9HHeK203Ivn+GSPkMUcXnczcCvokMcDVgD8fu0M= Received: by 10.141.20.7 with SMTP id x7mr2672263rvi.1194303396731; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:56:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.115.4 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 14:56:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <472F9DC6.8020607@op5.se> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 11/6/07, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > David Symonds wrote: > > On 11/5/07, David Symonds wrote: > >> [-s | --signoff] [] > >> - [--start-number ] [--numbered-files] > >> + [-n | --numbered-files | -N | --no-numbered] > >> + [--start-number ] > > > > Now that I look at it again, it seems the long options look quite > > inconsistent. I think it should be either > > --numbered-files/--no-numbered-files or --numbered/--no-numbered. My > > preference is with the latter (for brevity), but that breaks > > backward-compatibility. > > > > Would you accept a patch that changed --numbered-files to --numbered, > > and kept the former as a synonym? > > > > I thought files were always numbered, but the [PATCH m/n] wasn't. Have I > missed something? > > If your --numbered-files is supposed to affect only file-numbering, I'd > suggest *not* using --numbered, as it's ambiguous with "number-subject". You're right. There's both --numbered ([PATCH n/m] stuff) and --numbered-files (0001.patch instead of 0001-subject-line.patch). I'll revise my patch to clarify this. Dave.