From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David Symonds" Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 08:46:30 -0800 Message-ID: References: <200802081828.43849.kendy@suse.cz> <200802091525.36284.kendy@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Marco Costalba" , "Jan Holesovsky" , "Nicolas Pitre" , git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com To: "Johannes Schindelin" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 10 17:47:08 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JOFKd-0002Jg-M2 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:47:08 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751603AbYBJQqc (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:46:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751599AbYBJQqc (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:46:32 -0500 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.180]:61876 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751551AbYBJQqa (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:46:30 -0500 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so1648333wah.23 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 08:46:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=DlNXB4IXClzYEnKRrjZLU8exV56/IgzPtFNAOKdGeeg=; b=gysfFaPCfVzP0waYfn0X2GFDCmFrzws8UY5FPNQnMojRRSVm3ModuqWiPYUuELlguTq5PtzG3eRqG8aIlHtsIe0UUKSFCEyZQnBrUFws3MEEpf73YEHRa7KenM82j8VoGnL5X+UeiJP5fWs89HDK76Y31HAZ0YmDL+yYmD67zTc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Je4z9isWdlF/EN7xPchIg57BMXOCQMIcNFmE6Hmlvy+fAFJckxh0y/TCEfkRTHvq+6mRAtY9obWDDd73epwgvvpAkRTcE3XFXlVYqiyF2lDo7HfhuLNlbSMyKcpPciNKBzBA1HCTgAdsHS4TcIcmnutM5p1+SdSb6+CbsyCY4aM= Received: by 10.140.144.4 with SMTP id r4mr10028224rvd.15.1202661990458; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 08:46:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.135.17 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 08:46:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Feb 10, 2008 4:08 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Marco Costalba wrote: > > > Linux git repository is not very big and can be downloaded with easy. On > > the other end Linux history spans many more years then the repo does. > > > > The design choice here is two have *two repositories*, one with recent > > stuff and one historical, with stuff older then version 2.6.12 > > I do not think that this is an option: Jan already tried a shallow clone > (which would amount to something like what you propose), and it was still > too large. I think that was still pulling all the branches, so a shallow clone of just a couple of branches might be feasible. Dave.