From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David Symonds" Subject: Re: How it was at GitTogether'08 ? Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 21:08:27 -0800 Message-ID: References: <200811080254.53202.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Jakub Narebski" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Nov 08 06:10:13 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kyg5L-0008Ue-VH for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2008 06:10:12 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750966AbYKHFIb (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:08:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750985AbYKHFIa (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:08:30 -0500 Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.26]:62637 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750955AbYKHFI3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:08:29 -0500 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 6so672895eyi.37 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:08:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=exty367asv0YVTBSCJPAf5d12gycdzwXTIahplEhBMI=; b=Pz84Wu+R1iBEksGg/9AQ/eFpLCxAqm9MQsEZgEiGkYgTSbZ9HvBHnWgurOkAGIUYeS GJwEI+BPv5yd29mHlrvavMt+B5b+CiQ4UF9MBOTwxUX5mD65rltRSajeB5Pm6DWy993t 4G/9+/rhf2xyUMfmJ9i/cUF+nc7fjdWcp8Hmc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=lu2MvSFajHpxxViK20iE9+LuT3nxrz6LcMr6h4Z5SF3+FPBYJ3x0h0rFePcVpZgNBD K7ZDUFrUI/cPvpcsgnBJChn1wdYVD7cOyXWICc3QJrEOzrypd+li+sdrHL2A9a9wrO2U /riy4rMZPjV3LPXoS1L1OovQSOb+RpDPoJhyM= Received: by 10.210.127.10 with SMTP id z10mr4757038ebc.195.1226120907743; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:08:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.210.51.7 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 21:08:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200811080254.53202.jnareb@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Jakub Narebski wrote: Here's my thoughts on some of these talks. > Mon, Oct 27, 2008 > ----------------- > * Dscho: Contributing with Git > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j45cs5_nY2k It was a good intro, but I was expecting a few more non-GitTogether people. We had quite a large room, but there was only about a dozen other people who came along. I don't know whether that was the fault of the timing, lack of advertising, or a lack of interest. > * Junio: Git Chronicle > > blog: Junio went though a sort of statistical history of the Git project > that was fascinating (turns out there are still about 220 lines of code > still around from Linus original first commit). This was really interesting. It would be great to put this on a general web page instead of in a PDF. > * Petr: Renames Again and Again and Again > > IRC: detection of wholesame renames of directories (WIP) and '--follow' > limitation were mentioned, but outcome is unclear; pasky plans to hack > together some patch implementing explicit renames hinting One thing I didn't get around to bringing up: one of the benefits of diff-time rename detection that is often touted is that algorithms can improve over time. Do folk here know whether that has actually happened recently, in a general way? Do people actually expect major improvements in the future? > * Tom: GitHub > > IRC: a tour, some history, and insight into how it works; some nice > gimmicks, such as "gist" (a git backed pastebin), or like network graphs > (look graphically at forks of a repository). > > blog: Tom got to demonstrate GitHub and Gist to the group, most of whom > are very command line oriented and had not used either before. The demo of iGitHub (an iPhone app that can act as a clone/push target) looked really cool, if it can get further development. It could potentially be really handy for travellers who could push to their iPhone, and then push from there to an internet server. > * Scott: Linkable Library > > blog: got to talk about the need for a linkable git library > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/99608 It's good to see this starting to get wider traction. I think we discussed that there could be benefits to git itself, beyond just helping other programs access git repositories faster than fork/exec. > * Sam: perl.git > > blog: Sam demonstrated the work he went through to import 20 years of Perl > history into the git repository that the Perl team is just now finishing > transitioning to from Perforce. > > http://utsl.gen.nz/talks/perl-history/slides/ It was very cool to see old-school email addresses like in git, handled just fine. > * Tim: Git as a Media Repository > http://www.thousandparsec.net/~tim/media+git.pdf This has kicked off some mailing list discussion; I think this can be a major weak point for git, since checking out only a subtree (and only the latest revision) is the common SVN way, which copes with media repositories and the like just fine. > * JH: $$$ discussion > > IRC: It was about the Google Summer of Code 2008 mentor money. It was > decided (given most of the mentors were there) to use it to help a few > folks cover their travel expenses to the GitTogether. Most folks actually > had their costs covered by their employer (yay for some big companies!) > but a few paid out of pocket, so we are helping them defray it a bit. and > the rest is being used to order and distribute some git t-shirts. Yes, how are the t-shirts going? I seem to remember JH had volunteered to do the logistics there. Dave.