From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: Marking abandoned branches Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:45:38 +0200 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <9e4733910609130817r39bbf8a8x2e05461816d9d2a1@mail.gmail.com> <20060913152451.GH23891@pasky.or.cz> <9e4733910609130859v347a7a9ew5c3ebc982bf9b07b@mail.gmail.com> <45083490.9020203@gmail.com> <9e4733910609131024v28ccce5cx7dd427a55002bc4f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Sep 13 19:46:33 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNYob-0006gT-Hy for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:46:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750812AbWIMRpy (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:45:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750838AbWIMRpy (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:45:54 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:57065 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750812AbWIMRpx (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:45:53 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GNYnr-0006WL-Pi for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:45:39 +0200 Received: from 193.0.122.19 ([193.0.122.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:45:39 +0200 Received: from jnareb by 193.0.122.19 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:45:39 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.0.122.19 Mail-Copies-To: jnareb@gmail.com User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jon Smirl wrote: > On 9/13/06, Jakub Narebski wrote: >> Well, visualisers IIRC shows only requested branches. The only place where >> abandoned branches would show even when we probably don't want would be >> --all... one can try to use --all --not refs/abandoned/* > > In order to make the tools easier to use I would turn this around and > make --all show all active branches and the use something like > --include refs/abandoned to include the abandoned ones. Not that easy. Usually one have only refs/heads and refs/tags... unless one use --use-separate-remotes, and then one has refs/remotes/... -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git