From: "Samo Pogačnik" <samo_pogacnik@t-2.net>
To: "Patrick Steinhardt" <ps@pks.im>,
"Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] shallow: free local object_array allocations
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2026 17:21:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eefa06bc46f8029b68efe993da67d14e268e1bf2.camel@t-2.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aVy9ZveUOg3yum2X@pks.im>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1460 bytes --]
Hi Patrick,
thanks a lot for the reply.
On Tue, 2026-01-06 at 08:44 +0100, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 06:11:19PM +0000, Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
> wrote:
> > From: =?UTF-8?q?Samo=20Poga=C4=8Dnik?= <samo_pogacnik@t-2.net>
> >
> > The local object_array 'stack' in get_shallow_commits() function
> > does not free its dynamic elements before the function returns.
> > As a result elements remain allocated and their reference forgotten.
>
> I think the elements themselves are actually fine. We have the following
> loop:
>
> while (commit || i < heads->nr || stack.nr) {
>
> So while the stack still has entries, we'll keep on iteration.
> Furthermore, there is no `break` or early return in the loop, so we can
> sure that we actually pop every single element from the array.
>
> That being said, what we _don't_ do is to free the array itself. So I'm
> mostly splitting hairs with how the commit message is phrased, the
> change looks correct to me.
>
> What I'm wondering though is why we never hit this memory leak in our
> test suite. I guess the reason is simply that we ain't got enough test
> coverage around shallow clones. Have you seen this leak in the wild? And
> if so, can we add a test case that surfaces it?
>
Actually, the test I've added with the patch 2/2 does not pass without this
memory fix in linux-leaks and linux-reftable-leaks test runs.
best regards, Samo
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-09 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-09 18:11 [PATCH 0/2] shallow: handling fetch relative-deepen Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2025-12-09 18:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] shallow: free local object_array allocations Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-06 7:44 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-01-09 16:21 ` Samo Pogačnik [this message]
2026-01-09 16:33 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-09 18:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] shallow: handling fetch relative-deepen Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-06 7:44 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-01-09 16:48 ` Samo Pogačnik
2026-01-09 22:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-09 22:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] shallow: free local object_array allocations Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-09 22:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] shallow: handling fetch relative-deepen Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-10 4:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-10 5:13 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-10 5:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] shallow: free local object_array allocations Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-10 5:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] shallow: handling fetch relative-deepen Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-15 15:50 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-01-16 22:30 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-16 22:31 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] shallow: free local object_array allocations Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-16 22:31 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] shallow: handling fetch relative-deepen Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-02-11 13:38 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-02-13 20:48 ` Samo Pogačnik
2026-02-14 9:40 ` Samo Pogačnik
2026-02-15 11:19 ` Samo Pogačnik
2026-02-15 20:11 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] " Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-02-15 20:11 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] shallow: free local object_array allocations Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-02-15 20:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] shallow: handling fetch relative-deepen Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-02-20 22:34 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] " Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eefa06bc46f8029b68efe993da67d14e268e1bf2.camel@t-2.net \
--to=samo_pogacnik@t-2.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox