git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git pull for update of netdev fails.
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:58:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ees6hl$jdv$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20060920155431.GO8259@pasky.or.cz

Petr Baudis wrote:

> Dear diary, on Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 05:28:08PM CEST, I got a letter
> where Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> said that...

>> However, you can tell git that Jeff is being difficult by marking such 
>> branches individually as being rebased.
> 
> This is really a wrong way of describing the problem - I'd say that Git
> is being difficult here. The point is, the subsystem maintainers need to
> maintain stacks of patches and rebase against the main kernel branch
> regularily, and they want to still publish their current state. So it's
> not really any of them being strange or difficult, but Git being so
> because it has no seamless support for tracking those branches.

There was idea around moving remotes configuration to config file to have
some per branch configureation, including readonly for protecting tracking
branches, marking default branch for merge with (and which tracking
branch(es) to merge)...

...and that included marking branch _on the server side_ as being rebased,
i.e. without preserved history. Unfortunately, the discussion petered out
without changes to git. Branch marked as pu-like would either get '+'
in appropriate Pull line in remotes file generated during clone, or they
wouldn't need '+'.

By the way, there is '--force' option to git-pull/git-fetch...
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-09-20 20:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-20 15:03 git pull for update of netdev fails Stephen Hemminger
2006-09-20 15:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-20 15:54   ` Petr Baudis
2006-09-20 16:02     ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-09-20 16:07       ` Petr Baudis
2006-09-20 16:19         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-20 16:26           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-20 16:34             ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-20 16:49               ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-20 17:10                 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-20 21:23               ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-09-20 21:27                 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-20 21:37                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-09-20 21:42                     ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-20 21:53                       ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-09-20 21:53                       ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-20 21:49                     ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-20 16:28           ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-20 16:38             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-20 21:14           ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-09-20 21:21             ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-20 21:27               ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-09-20 21:40                 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-20 22:34             ` Jakub Narebski
2006-09-23  3:44             ` Petr Baudis
2006-09-23  4:00               ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-23  4:09                 ` Petr Baudis
2006-09-23 13:15                   ` Catalin Marinas
2006-09-23 13:10               ` Catalin Marinas
2006-09-24 20:54                 ` Petr Baudis
2006-09-25 12:47                   ` Catalin Marinas
2006-09-20 16:05     ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-20 16:18       ` Petr Baudis
2006-09-20 16:33         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-20 20:01         ` Jakub Narebski
2006-09-20 16:15     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-20 16:59       ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-20 17:34         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-20 23:12         ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-09-23  4:18       ` Petr Baudis
2006-09-20 19:58     ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2006-09-21  9:14       ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-09-20 19:24   ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='ees6hl$jdv$1@sea.gmane.org' \
    --to=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).