From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: git pull for update of netdev fails. Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:34:47 +0200 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <20060920080308.673a1e93@localhost.localdomain> <20060920155431.GO8259@pasky.or.cz> <20060920160756.GP8259@pasky.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 21 00:35:36 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GQAez-0003xI-FR for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:35:18 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932425AbWITWfN (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:35:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932427AbWITWfN (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:35:13 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:21146 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932425AbWITWfL (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:35:11 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GQAec-0003sf-HC for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:34:54 +0200 Received: from host-81-190-26-109.torun.mm.pl ([81.190.26.109]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:34:54 +0200 Received: from jnareb by host-81-190-26-109.torun.mm.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:34:54 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-81-190-26-109.torun.mm.pl Mail-Copies-To: jnareb@gmail.com User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Another, even more serious problems with rebasing: You can introduce a bug > by rebasing. Meaning: git-rebase can succeed, even compilation is fine, > but the sum of your patches, and the patches you are rebasing on, is > buggy. And there is _no_ way to bisect this, since the "good" version can > be gone for good. Well, you can always tag tip of branch before rebasing, and remove the tag when rebased branch is tested. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git