From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: start to generate PATH_INFO URLs Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:19:42 +0200 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <20060929221641.GC2871@admingilde.org> <20061003171229.GN2871@admingilde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 03 19:21:59 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GUnwt-0007Ip-AN for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:20:55 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030332AbWJCRUu (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:20:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030334AbWJCRUu (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:20:50 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:27596 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030332AbWJCRUu (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:20:50 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GUnvU-0006v8-9G for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:19:28 +0200 Received: from host-81-190-17-45.torun.mm.pl ([81.190.17.45]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:19:28 +0200 Received: from jnareb by host-81-190-17-45.torun.mm.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:19:28 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-81-190-17-45.torun.mm.pl Mail-Copies-To: jnareb@gmail.com User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Martin Waitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 02:16:05PM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote: >> Martin Waitz wrote: >> > Instead of providing the project as a ?p= parameter it is simply appended >> > to the base URI. >> >> I have just modified href() to be able to use it for actions which don't >> need the ?p= parameter... and you didn't take into consideration the case >> when $params{'project'} is set, but undefined. > > is this handled correctly in the second patch which got committed to > next? I think it is (from the examining the patch, not from testing). Perhaps we should use PATH_INFO if current URL uses PATH_INFO... -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git