From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: Cleanup Git logo and Git logo target generation Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 22:54:34 +0200 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <20060919212725.GA13132@pasky.or.cz> <7vac4qs43g.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200610061231.06017.jnareb@gmail.com> <7vwt7aio8l.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061008201031.GL20017@pasky.or.cz> <7vbqomim46.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Oct 08 22:54:26 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GWff1-0001cq-Vp for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2006 22:54:12 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751388AbWJHUyI (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Oct 2006 16:54:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751389AbWJHUyI (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Oct 2006 16:54:08 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:13955 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751388AbWJHUyF (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Oct 2006 16:54:05 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GWfei-0001Yf-Uo for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2006 22:53:52 +0200 Received: from host-81-190-27-91.torun.mm.pl ([81.190.27.91]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Oct 2006 22:53:52 +0200 Received: from jnareb by host-81-190-27-91.torun.mm.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Oct 2006 22:53:52 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-81-190-27-91.torun.mm.pl Mail-Copies-To: jnareb@gmail.com User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > Petr Baudis writes: > >> Is there a problem with taking <200610061231.06017.jnareb@gmail.com>? >> >> I think it's currently not worth the complexity and breakage of >> backwards compatibility to do the more elaborate form you proposed. > > I agree with that, except that the 72x27 dimension bit troubles > me. First, that's the problem for the future. The 72x27 was there, I have not introduced this. Second, 72x27 is size override, so although logo would better be 72x27, but if it is not it will be scaled to given size. http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/objects.html#visual -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git