From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pazu Subject: Re: [PATCH] Removes the declaration from gitweb.pl Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:01:12 -0300 Message-ID: References: <20061011172553.GA1147@linux-mips.org> <200610120745.00909.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> <200610122321.18630.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 13 15:02:50 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GYMg5-00041x-RM for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:02:18 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751649AbWJMNCL (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:02:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751679AbWJMNCL (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:02:11 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:43963 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751649AbWJMNCK (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:02:10 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GYMfg-0003vV-E0 for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:01:52 +0200 Received: from 200.213.42.52 ([200.213.42.52]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:01:52 +0200 Received: from pazu by 200.213.42.52 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:01:52 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 200.213.42.52 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909) In-Reply-To: <200610122321.18630.jnareb@gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Narebski wrote: > So what should be our decision? Honor IE quirks ;-) and either remove > XML declaration, or use Transitional DTD? Add back SPC to   conversion > in esc_html? Ignore broken browsers? My bad here. In my first email I said that using the Transitional DTD would fix the problem, but I was wrong. It doesn't matter the DTD you use, if you add a declaration, IE will get it wrong and activate quirks mode. -- Marcus