From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: [PATCH] Removes the declaration from gitweb.pl Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:07:54 +0200 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <20061011172553.GA1147@linux-mips.org> <200610120745.00909.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> <200610122321.18630.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 13 15:10:32 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GYMnn-0006M2-MG for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:10:17 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751682AbWJMNKM (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:10:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751692AbWJMNKM (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:10:12 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:50114 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751682AbWJMNKK (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:10:10 -0400 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GYMna-0006H1-4Q for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:10:02 +0200 Received: from host-81-190-17-207.torun.mm.pl ([81.190.17.207]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:10:02 +0200 Received: from jnareb by host-81-190-17-207.torun.mm.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:10:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-81-190-17-207.torun.mm.pl Mail-Copies-To: jnareb@gmail.com User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Pazu wrote: > Jakub Narebski wrote: > >> So what should be our decision? Honor IE quirks ;-) and either remove >> XML declaration, or use Transitional DTD? Add back SPC to   conversion >> in esc_html? Ignore broken browsers? > > My bad here. In my first email I said that using the Transitional DTD > would fix the problem, but I was wrong. It doesn't matter the DTD you > use, if you add a declaration, IE will get it wrong and activate > quirks mode. Well, there is yet another solution. Do browser detection, and do not output declaration for IE. Perhaps that would be best solution. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git