From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pazu Subject: Re: [PATCH] Removes the declaration from gitweb.pl Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:09:31 -0300 Message-ID: References: <20061011172553.GA1147@linux-mips.org> <200610120745.00909.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> <200610122321.18630.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 13 16:13:21 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GYNlY-0005wg-8L for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:12:00 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750844AbWJMOLt (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:11:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750845AbWJMOLt (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:11:49 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:24272 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750842AbWJMOLt (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:11:49 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GYNkc-0005dl-NC for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:11:02 +0200 Received: from 200.213.42.52 ([200.213.42.52]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:11:02 +0200 Received: from pazu by 200.213.42.52 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:11:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 200.213.42.52 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Narebski wrote: > Well, there is yet another solution. Do browser detection, and do not output > declaration for IE. Perhaps that would be best solution. Well, there's now drawback in removing the XML declaration (no browser requires it), so why even worry about browser detection? -- Marcus