From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Progress reporting (was: VCS comparison table) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:18:56 +0100 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <200610270202.k9R22Wxf004208@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> <4541D291.5020205@op5.se> <20061027144656.GA32451@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Followup-To: gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general,gmane.comp.version-control.git Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-81-190-18-116.torun.mm.pl Mail-Copies-To: jnareb@gmail.com User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GeUG3-0002rx-5n for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:20:43 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161202AbWJ3KUk convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 05:20:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161209AbWJ3KUj (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 05:20:39 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:44686 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161202AbWJ3KUi (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 05:20:38 -0500 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GeUFP-0002hz-IE for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:20:03 +0100 Received: from host-81-190-18-116.torun.mm.pl ([81.190.18.116]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:20:03 +0100 Received: from jnareb by host-81-190-18-116.torun.mm.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:20:03 +0100 To: git@vger.kernel.org Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Jakub Narebski wrote: > Ilpo Nyyss=F6nen wrote: >> 3. Understanding output >>=20 >> G: Speaks a language of its own, hard to understand. No progress >> reported for long lasting operations. >>=20 >> B: Could maybe speak a bit more. Progress reporting is quite good. >=20 > Which long lasting operations lack progress bar/progress reporting? > "git clone" and "git fetch"/"git pull" both have progress report > for both "smart" git://, git+ssh:// and local protocols, and "dumb" > http://, https://, ftp://, rsync:// protocols. "git rebase" has > progress report. "git am" has progress report. I was bitten lately by git lack of progress reporting for git-push. While it nicely reports local progress (generating data) it unfortunate= ly lacks wget like, "curl -o" like or scp like pack upload progress reporting. And while usually push is fast, initial push of whole project to empty repository can be quite slow on low-bandwidth link (or busy network). git version 1.4.3.3 on local side, git+ssh:// protocol, git version 1.4.3.3.g9ab2 on the remote side (repo.or.cz). --=20 Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git