From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: [BUG] StGit removed git branch of the same name as StGit branch Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:57:16 +0100 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <200611202201.45521.jnareb@gmail.com> <20061120222812.GE12285@fieldses.org> <20061120224800.GF12285@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 27 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-81-190-24-209.torun.mm.pl Mail-Copies-To: jnareb@gmail.com User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GmI3k-0003GM-UB for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:56:18 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966875AbWKTW4K (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:56:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S966644AbWKTW4K (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:56:10 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:36550 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966450AbWKTW4H (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:56:07 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GmI3X-0003D6-Rg for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:56:03 +0100 Received: from host-81-190-24-209.torun.mm.pl ([81.190.24.209]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:56:03 +0100 Received: from jnareb by host-81-190-24-209.torun.mm.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:56:03 +0100 To: git@vger.kernel.org Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 11:37:54PM +0100, Jakub Narebski wrote: >> J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>> The idea I guess was to make it possible to use stgit (and only stgit) >>> for everything, and never type a git command. It might have been better >>> to make stgit only manage patch series, and admit that people should use >>> git for the rest. Then it might work more like you expect. >> >> Yes, I expected to use StGit as a kind of preprocessing (branch preparation) >> for git. > > The multiple-porcelains idea seems like a mistake to me--it'd be fine if > you're just adding new features on the side, but who wants to learn > entirely different sets of commands, with subtly different syntax, > semantics, and feature sets, for doing the same thing? I don't think so. StGit seems that way because it mainly adds new feature: patch management. But it can be used both as standalone SCM (like Quilt), or as a tool to manage patches in branch (rebase/cherry-pick on steroids). -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git