From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: branch..merge specifying remote branch name Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 10:14:49 +0100 Organization: At home Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Dec 23 10:15:20 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Gy2yL-0003dv-Ed for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 10:15:17 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752356AbWLWJPJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:15:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752793AbWLWJPJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:15:09 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:38511 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752356AbWLWJPH (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:15:07 -0500 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Gy2y6-0002mu-Bk for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 10:15:02 +0100 Received: from host-81-190-25-107.torun.mm.pl ([81.190.25.107]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 10:15:02 +0100 Received: from jnareb by host-81-190-25-107.torun.mm.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 10:15:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-81-190-25-107.torun.mm.pl Mail-Copies-To: jnareb@gmail.com User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: About the discussion about branch..merge specifying remote branch name and relative merits of specifying remote branch name (without need for tracking branch), and local branch name (which is supposedly more user friendly, and branch name specifies also remote usually)... Perhaps it is time to resurrect branch..mergeLocal (or localMerge) idea, and both sides would be happy (well, at least when one would code it ;-). -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git