From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Mark Levedahl" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make gitk work reasonably well on Cygwin. Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:33:51 -0500 Message-ID: References: <45C14563.8060707@verizon.net> <45C209AA.25141180@eudaptics.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 01 18:34:19 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HCfpB-0007XY-R1 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:34:18 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161234AbXBAReP (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:34:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422728AbXBAReP (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:34:15 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:38558 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161226AbXBAReO (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:34:14 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HCfp2-0000RU-6M for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:34:08 +0100 Received: from sahara.mdnt.com ([12.109.151.100]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:34:08 +0100 Received: from mdl123 by sahara.mdnt.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:34:08 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sahara.mdnt.com X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Johannes Schindelin" wrote in message news:Pine.LNX.4.63.0702011659210.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de... > Hi, > > On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote: > >> Isn't this the same patch that Mike Nefari posted yesterday? > > Judging by the email address, Mike Nefari and Mark Levedahl are one and > the same. I have no idea how the name "Mike Nefari" got on my hotmail account, but this patch is from me. I apologize for all of the email system related confusion. Mark Levedahl