From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: Deprecation/Removal schedule Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:11:39 +0100 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <7v8xfdnlqm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 05 11:11:02 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HE0oP-00048Q-Us for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:11:02 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752146AbXBEKK6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Feb 2007 05:10:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751422AbXBEKK6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Feb 2007 05:10:58 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:45793 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752146AbXBEKK6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Feb 2007 05:10:58 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HE0nv-0002vH-12 for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:10:31 +0100 Received: from host-81-190-29-4.torun.mm.pl ([81.190.29.4]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:10:31 +0100 Received: from jnareb by host-81-190-29-4.torun.mm.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:10:31 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-81-190-29-4.torun.mm.pl Mail-Copies-To: jnareb@gmail.com User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Narebski wrote: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * git-p4import, git-quiltimport and contrib/gitview >> >> These have seen almost no activity since their appearance. It >> could be that they are already perfect and many people are >> using them happily, but I find it a bit hard to believe. > > I agree with removal of gitview; I'd rather leave importers, even > if they haven's seen any activity. If they import correctly, what > is to work on more? An alternative for importers would be to move them into contrib area (I think unmaintained but not obsolete programs can be there in contrib). -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git