From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: Difficulties in advertising a new branch to git newbies Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:58:35 +0100 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <87odognuhl.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <87y7nbdeaw.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <7vveifkczt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <87wt2vce31.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <7vwt2vgkuc.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <87sldjcbxt.wl%cworth@cworth.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 06 20:58:02 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HEWS0-0004MQ-1n for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:58:00 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752299AbXBFT5c (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:57:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965395AbXBFT5c (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:57:32 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:55253 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965389AbXBFT53 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:57:29 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HEWRD-0006Fm-89 for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:57:11 +0100 Received: from host-81-190-29-4.torun.mm.pl ([81.190.29.4]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:57:11 +0100 Received: from jnareb by host-81-190-29-4.torun.mm.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:57:11 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-81-190-29-4.torun.mm.pl Mail-Copies-To: jnareb@gmail.com User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Carl Worth wrote: > On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 11:14:03 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> If you tell your users to --use-separate-remote in the "git >> clone" instruction, would that solve your backward compatibility >> problem? > > Ah, yes. That should actually do the trick. Actually git has this option removed (at least from docs; perhaps it is simply no-op). -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git