From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: git-pull and tag objects Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 02:21:36 +0100 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <1170933407.15431.38.camel@okra.transitives.com> <81b0412b0702090133qa4eb0c0v6a2d309fe9653a3f@mail.gmail.com> <7v4ppurka1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070210142322.GB25607@thunk.org> <7vy7n5gs0y.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070212162745.GB2741@thunk.org> <7vr6su1szp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 15 02:25:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HHVMy-0003U1-7d for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 02:25:08 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751478AbXBOBZE (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:25:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750737AbXBOBZE (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:25:04 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:51844 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751478AbXBOBZB (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:25:01 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HHVL7-0000n3-96 for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 02:23:13 +0100 Received: from host-81-190-26-5.torun.mm.pl ([81.190.26.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 02:23:13 +0100 Received: from jnareb by host-81-190-26-5.torun.mm.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 02:23:13 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-81-190-26-5.torun.mm.pl Mail-Copies-To: Jakub Narebski User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds wrote: > One thing that _might_ be a good idea for tags (if people _really_ want to > actually update tags under the same name) is to have a "parent" pointer > for tag objects, the same way we have for commits. That way you could - if > you really wanted to - create a chain of tags, and show the history of > them. Wouldn't it be better to just use reflog for given tag? That assuming of course that we could protect tag reflog from pruning... -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git