From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Schemenauer Subject: Re: git push to a non-bare repository Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20070319020053.GA11371@thunk.org> To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 21 18:40:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HU4nC-00009c-UG for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:40:11 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933226AbXCURkG (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:40:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933224AbXCURkG (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:40:06 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:52005 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933196AbXCURkE (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:40:04 -0400 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HU4n4-0000iS-SM for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:40:03 +0100 Received: from s0106000625c557dc.ss.shawcable.net ([70.64.11.234]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:40:02 +0100 Received: from nas by s0106000625c557dc.ss.shawcable.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:40:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s0106000625c557dc.ss.shawcable.net User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Debian) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Matthieu Moy wrote: > It's not really an option in my case. A is a fixe-IP/fixe-DNS machine, > while B is my home machine, behind a NAT modem-router. So, I'd have to > figure out my home IP, port-forward the ssh port from the modem to my > machine, ... I think this is a pretty common scenario. I have a central server that I would like to push to and a bunch of other machines behind firewalls. Pulling from the central machine is not practical. Neil