From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: Understanding version 4 packs Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:49:07 +0200 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <20070324202356.GA20734@bohr.gbar.dtu.dk> <20070325083530.GA25523@bohr.gbar.dtu.dk> <20070325091806.GH25863@spearce.org> <20070325203141.GA12376@spearce.org> <20070326020257.GB13247@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 26 11:13:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HVlGJ-0002W8-Vm for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:13:12 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753545AbXCZJNJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2007 05:13:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753549AbXCZJNI (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2007 05:13:08 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:55611 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753545AbXCZJNG (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2007 05:13:06 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HVl98-0004ea-MA for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:05:46 +0200 Received: from host-89-229-25-173.torun.mm.pl ([89.229.25.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:05:46 +0200 Received: from jnareb by host-89-229-25-173.torun.mm.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:05:46 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-89-229-25-173.torun.mm.pl Mail-Copies-To: Jakub Narebski User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> BTW Shawn there is no need to store the number of tree records at the >> beginning of the tree object since that can be deduced directly from the >> object size stored in the object header. > > Doh. Yes, of course. But if it makes for easier _implementation_, perhaps it should stay... -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git