From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: [PATCH] Keep rename/rename conflicts of intermediate merges while doing recursive merge Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 14:06:58 +0200 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <20070329141230.GB16739@hermes> <81b0412b0703290744h34b6ef01s4e6f90b1d7ed231b@mail.gmail.com> <81b0412b0703290804n13af6f40we79f7251562c540@mail.gmail.com> <20070329183237.GB2809@steel.home> <20070331104947.GA4377@steel.home> <20070331114938.GB4377@steel.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Mar 31 14:04:20 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HXcJc-0007Q3-Dr for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 14:04:16 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752990AbXCaMD4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2007 08:03:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753000AbXCaMD4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2007 08:03:56 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:52364 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752990AbXCaMD4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2007 08:03:56 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HXcJB-0004Nx-3z for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 14:03:49 +0200 Received: from host-89-229-25-173.torun.mm.pl ([89.229.25.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 14:03:49 +0200 Received: from jnareb by host-89-229-25-173.torun.mm.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 14:03:49 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-89-229-25-173.torun.mm.pl Mail-Copies-To: Jakub Narebski User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Alex Riesen wrote: > The result seem to be at least predictable. Still, doesn't it mean > that once a rename/rename conflict is in it has to be resolved > manually forever? What about git-rerere2 idea (recording resolving of tree-level conflicts, i.e. rename/rename and such)? -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git