From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Rename "bury" back to "sink". Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 01:22:54 +0200 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <20070504224639.26133.6157.stgit@gandelf.nowhere.earth> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat May 05 01:23:33 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hk77b-0006LV-Gs for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 01:23:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161580AbXEDXXO convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 19:23:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161544AbXEDXXN (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 19:23:13 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:36245 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161560AbXEDXXJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 19:23:09 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hk77B-00076P-Nx for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 01:23:05 +0200 Received: from host-89-229-25-173.torun.mm.pl ([89.229.25.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 May 2007 01:23:05 +0200 Received: from jnareb by host-89-229-25-173.torun.mm.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 May 2007 01:23:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-89-229-25-173.torun.mm.pl Mail-Copies-To: Jakub Narebski User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Yann Dirson wrote: > Well, it looks like the voices we heard on this naming issue were > quite equally cast towards each of the 2 name. >=20 > Let my vote be to get back to "sink", so the user can easily pair the > command with "float". =A0I expect that any previously-silent majoity > prefering "bury" will talk now, before Catalin decides if he wants > this patch in the next release :) I'm rather partial to "bury" rather than "sink", as "bury" has the notation of going deeper (like "float" has notation of guing up, to the surface), while "sink" does not need to. Additionally "sink" is a noun as well as a verb. > Oh, this patch reminds me we still have to activate rename > detection... True. --=20 Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git