Re: [PATCH] Prevent megablobs from gunking up git packs

[Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>]

Dana How wrote:

> There's actually an even more extreme example from my day job.
> The software team has a project whose files/revisions would be
> similar to those in the linux kernel (larger commits, I'm sure).
> But they have *ONE* 500MB file they check in because it takes
> 2 or 3 days to generate and different people use different versions of it.
> I'm sure it has 50+ revisions now.  If they converted to git and included
> these blobs in their packfile, that's a 25GB uncompressed increase!
> *Every* git operation must wade through 10X -- 100X more packfile.
> Or it could be kept in 50+ loose objects in objects/xx ,
> requiring a few extra syscalls by each user to get a new version.

Or keeping those large objects in separate, _kept_ packfile, containing
only those objects (which can delta well, even if they are large).

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git