From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ramkumar Ramachandra Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve documentation for git-remote-helpers Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:08:31 +0530 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Git Mailing List , Jonathan Nieder , Sverre Rabbelier To: Daniel Barkalow X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 22 04:38:57 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NtYTh-0006By-1U for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:38:57 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754103Ab0CVDiw (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:38:52 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:41684 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754063Ab0CVDiv (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:38:51 -0400 Received: by gyg8 with SMTP id 8so2501613gyg.19 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:38:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=FzqUYkqtc62fmvRBVdo3Tjdpx006qACjKQObEUs6J4c=; b=UbTTtsTzwULDbg+tjHo+nk4u896i+3zYajBSVaKAtyojrJ1MLVHHy51nXtaDzFfudg 12W3pkkBjjyWYDxL0b4livbm1iu2Lzpu+Qp21Aigh5S5Rdnnl0FKstbaPThrR0go9lVT QiyzU1mR5hhQ7yr0+LWzh65+/qiAlP0zCTFk8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=OXwzGcMkx5OQNfgfhij3uaVXALq0HqhxKh80zE/nitDfaE6WkGQSGv5YR823FhihZS J9Vtndht0uiM4krdxaR4qiHIyFvIyMWmlnmOU+No29Phz35IQSBHc9CPhmAE22r/tp7b /IgtiolsNPzZ5fAXpPJ+Bc6byrpeQVgszgrAM= Received: by 10.91.51.19 with SMTP id d19mr3673857agk.101.1269229131069; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:38:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > Every capability doesn't necessarily have a corresponding command with > the same name, and vice-versa (see refspec spec?). Besides, I think > it's necessary for the manpage to have a list of capabilities listed > in one place. I'll think about a better format when we get more > capabilities/ commands. I think I might have misunderstood what you said. So, I've posted a third revision of the patch- is it the desired result? -- Ram