From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Yakov Lerner" Subject: Re: [PATCH] auto-detect changed $prefix in Makefile and properly rebuild to avoid broken install Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 00:38:35 +0300 Message-ID: References: <0J0V00LDT7B9BU00@mxout2.netvision.net.il> <7vver3cxlw.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vhd2nctjk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jun 14 23:38:50 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fqd4R-0001Vx-6I for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 23:38:40 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932328AbWFNVig (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2006 17:38:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932373AbWFNVig (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2006 17:38:36 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.183]:35172 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932328AbWFNVig (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2006 17:38:36 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id i49so45572pye for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:38:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UqdudKPosXrRTwG4xiYm0WU8iRH24biKAuCwFlDuN5Tydby2B1y5W0QlQ9fyP3wN8x0p5YsfUlXLcZbsrPeS1cGO8Gwq6F0DaKEgzgzXPsu8mzf7JlYnlyOKqVLonzw/fbye/wcbDVwP4+3baLag1T3WFGjyA0LFGolNeo0Xu1E= Received: by 10.35.93.15 with SMTP id v15mr1759929pyl; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:38:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.14.20 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:38:35 -0700 (PDT) To: "Junio C Hamano" In-Reply-To: <7vhd2nctjk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 6/15/06, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Yakov Lerner" writes: > > > I think single GIT-BUILD-FLAGS > > is enough, which will cover prefixes, too. Is this OK ? > > Yes, it was what I was getting at. I think a single > GIT-BUILD-FLAGS (or whatever name the list can fight over while > I am away) is preferred. Either GIT-CFLAGS or GIT-BUILD-FLAGS, whichever is shorter :-) Yakov