From: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"sbeller@google.com" <sbeller@google.com>,
"avarab@gmail.com" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"larsxschneider@gmail.com" <larsxschneider@gmail.com>,
"gitster@pobox.com" <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Lazy-load trees when reading commit-graph
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 15:41:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3a8b9ff-4aba-100f-e59e-613f6a094513@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180406192146.GC921@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On 4/6/2018 3:21 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 07:09:30PM +0000, Derrick Stolee wrote:
>
>> Derrick Stolee (4):
>> treewide: rename tree to maybe_tree
>> commit: create get_commit_tree() method
>> treewide: replace maybe_tree with accessor methods
>> commit-graph: lazy-load trees for commits
> I gave this only a cursory read, but it addresses my concern from the
> previous round.
>
> If I were doing it myself, I probably would have folded patches 1 and 3
> together. They are touching all the same spots, and it would be an error
> for any case converted in patch 1 to not get converted in patch 3. I'm
> assuming you caught them all due to Coccinelle, though IMHO it is
> somewhat overkill here. By folding them together the compiler could tell
> you which spots you missed.
>
> And going forward, I doubt it is going to be a common error for people
> to use maybe_tree directly. Between the name and the warning comment,
> you'd have to really try to shoot yourself in the foot with it. The
> primary concern was catching people using the existing "tree" name,
> whose semantics changed.
>
> All that said, I'm fine with having it done this way, too.
Thanks. As a double-check that I caught all of the 'maybe_tree'
accesses, I ran the following:
$ git grep maybe_tree | grep -v get_commit_tree
commit-graph.c: item->maybe_tree = NULL;
commit-graph.c: c->maybe_tree = lookup_tree(&oid);
commit-graph.c: return c->maybe_tree;
commit-graph.c: if (c->maybe_tree)
commit-graph.c: return c->maybe_tree;
commit.c: if (commit->maybe_tree || !commit->object.parsed)
commit.c: return commit->maybe_tree;
commit.c: item->maybe_tree = lookup_tree(&parent);
commit.h: struct tree *maybe_tree;
contrib/coccinelle/commit.cocci:- &c->maybe_tree->object.oid
contrib/coccinelle/commit.cocci:- c->maybe_tree->object.oid.hash
contrib/coccinelle/commit.cocci:- c->maybe_tree
contrib/coccinelle/commit.cocci:+ c->maybe_tree = s
contrib/coccinelle/commit.cocci:+ return c->maybe_tree;
merge-recursive.c: commit->maybe_tree = tree;
Thanks,
-Stolee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-06 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-03 12:00 [PATCH 0/3] Lazy-load trees when reading commit-graph Derrick Stolee
2018-04-03 12:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] commit: create get_commit_tree() method Derrick Stolee
2018-04-03 12:00 ` [PATCH 2/3] treewide: use get_commit_tree() for tree access Derrick Stolee
2018-04-03 12:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] commit-graph: lazy-load trees Derrick Stolee
2018-04-03 18:00 ` Stefan Beller
2018-04-03 18:22 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-04-03 18:37 ` Stefan Beller
2018-04-03 12:15 ` [PATCH 0/3] Lazy-load trees when reading commit-graph Derrick Stolee
2018-04-03 13:06 ` Jeff King
2018-04-03 13:14 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-04-03 20:20 ` Jeff King
2018-04-04 12:08 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-04-06 19:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Derrick Stolee
2018-04-06 19:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] treewide: rename tree to maybe_tree Derrick Stolee
2018-04-06 19:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] commit: create get_commit_tree() method Derrick Stolee
2018-04-06 19:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] treewide: replace maybe_tree with accessor methods Derrick Stolee
2018-04-06 19:09 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] commit-graph: lazy-load trees for commits Derrick Stolee
2018-04-06 19:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Lazy-load trees when reading commit-graph Jeff King
2018-04-06 19:41 ` Derrick Stolee [this message]
2018-04-06 19:45 ` Stefan Beller
2018-04-08 23:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-04-09 13:15 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-04-09 17:25 ` Stefan Beller
2018-04-07 18:40 ` Jakub Narebski
2018-04-08 1:17 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-04-11 20:41 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f3a8b9ff-4aba-100f-e59e-613f6a094513@gmail.com \
--to=stolee@gmail.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=dstolee@microsoft.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=larsxschneider@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).