From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Stefan Pfetzing" Subject: Re: [osol-bugs] access() behaves strange when used as root Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 22:43:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20060523153415.GB3638@greyarea> <20060523154213.GB21587@totally.trollied.org> <44735D61.nail4RQ116Y06@burner> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 23 22:44:00 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FidjU-0006JW-98 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 23 May 2006 22:44:00 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932163AbWEWUn5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2006 16:43:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932192AbWEWUn5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2006 16:43:57 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.229]:61462 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932163AbWEWUn5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2006 16:43:57 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i34so1440380wra for ; Tue, 23 May 2006 13:43:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UFLUz9eV35OO667GsXxwBnOe46RjRLtCxDyhlAxMI9IECtLO99cf2Irxg43d1bKiXBNwzzdXLCU8gRUL54hUnlE2OUA9NC0zN8vubYje2XRtGx/oHK2uMPl50MBcUqYGZniGvPMAR6fjZ6KpmkTVFMWdOj4U/+2RaUi1HWtKS/Y= Received: by 10.65.205.12 with SMTP id h12mr2380983qbq; Tue, 23 May 2006 13:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.253.10 with HTTP; Tue, 23 May 2006 13:43:56 -0700 (PDT) To: "Git Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <44735D61.nail4RQ116Y06@burner> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi Joerg, 2006/5/23, Joerg Schilling : > Before claiming that Soplaris is not behaving correctly, you should have a look > into the standard....... I didn't say Solaris does not behave "correctly" - I just said it does not behave as every other POSIX/SUS Unix I know. > The behavior of Solaris access() is OK. I know that its completely ok with SUS - and I did say that before. Primarily I was just wondering about this behaviour and IMHO the git developers were too. bye Stefan -- http://www.dreamind.de/ Oroborus and Debian GNU/Linux Developer.