From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Noonan Subject: Re: Anyone have access to 64-bit Vista? Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:01:06 -0800 Message-ID: References: <83d7aaa40901270130g3bebb3d6we4839b567f310e46@mail.gmail.com> <20090127122456.0df531c3.stephen@exigencecorp.com> <83d7aaa40901271441h47c98edepc16f5026de636134@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Geoffrey Lee , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 28 00:02:57 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LRwxE-0003tF-Lu for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:02:49 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751344AbZA0XBK (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:01:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751020AbZA0XBI (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:01:08 -0500 Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.27]:13683 "EHLO qw-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750899AbZA0XBH (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:01:07 -0500 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so3232648qwe.37 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:01:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.214.80.1 with SMTP id d1mr5704516qab.288.1233097266264; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:01:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Geoffrey Lee wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Stephen Haberman >> wrote: >> > It kind of works on my Vista 64-bit system--I do not see the shell >> > extensions in the native Windows Explorer (which is 64 bit), but I do >> > see the shell extensions in an Explorer replacement I use (Xplorer2) >> > that is 32-bit. >> > >> > I've seen other oddities in 32-bit vs. 64-bit programs--e.g. my alt tab >> > replacement (Joe), which is 32-bit, works great with 32-bit programs >> > but cannot remove focus from 64-bit programs (IE, Windows Explorer, >> > etc.). Ironically, very few of the programs I use are 64-bit, so I get >> > by with the alt tab replacement. >> > >> > - Stephen >> > >> >> Thanks! It seems that 64-bit explorer.exe will not load 32-bit shell >> extensions. At least now I know I'm not going crazy. :) > > How could it? You cannot have 32-bit code and 64-bit code running in the > same process. At least not with x86_64 (AFAIK). > Correct, this is also my biggest gripe with how x86_64 is implemented. Thank you, AMD! - Steven