From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Noonan Subject: Re: Anyone have access to 64-bit Vista? Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:15:11 -0800 Message-ID: References: <83d7aaa40901270130g3bebb3d6we4839b567f310e46@mail.gmail.com> <20090127122456.0df531c3.stephen@exigencecorp.com> <83d7aaa40901271441h47c98edepc16f5026de636134@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Geoffrey Lee , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 28 00:17:03 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LRxAj-00007n-Ci for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:16:45 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751403AbZA0XPQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:15:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751331AbZA0XPP (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:15:15 -0500 Received: from mail-qy0-f11.google.com ([209.85.221.11]:51938 "EHLO mail-qy0-f11.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751328AbZA0XPO (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:15:14 -0500 Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so7600977qyk.13 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:15:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.215.39.6 with SMTP id r6mr4722630qaj.15.1233098111896; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:15:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Steven Noonan wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Johannes Schindelin >> wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Geoffrey Lee wrote: >> > >> >> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Stephen Haberman >> >> wrote: >> >> > It kind of works on my Vista 64-bit system--I do not see the shell >> >> > extensions in the native Windows Explorer (which is 64 bit), but I >> >> > do see the shell extensions in an Explorer replacement I use >> >> > (Xplorer2) that is 32-bit. >> >> > >> >> > I've seen other oddities in 32-bit vs. 64-bit programs--e.g. my alt >> >> > tab replacement (Joe), which is 32-bit, works great with 32-bit >> >> > programs but cannot remove focus from 64-bit programs (IE, Windows >> >> > Explorer, etc.). Ironically, very few of the programs I use are >> >> > 64-bit, so I get by with the alt tab replacement. >> >> >> >> Thanks! It seems that 64-bit explorer.exe will not load 32-bit shell >> >> extensions. At least now I know I'm not going crazy. :) >> > >> > How could it? You cannot have 32-bit code and 64-bit code running in the >> > same process. At least not with x86_64 (AFAIK). >> >> Correct, this is also my biggest gripe with how x86_64 is implemented. >> Thank you, AMD! > > Come on, at least it is not Itanium. > True, but x86_64 had so much potential, and Itanium was doomed from the start. http://www.emulators.com/docs/nx05_vx64.htm -- This guy has it right. - Steven