From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: walt Subject: Re: Start deprecating "git-command" in favor of "git command" Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:40:13 -0700 Organization: none Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jul 01 00:40:38 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I4lcL-0001gj-GH for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 00:40:37 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753314AbXF3Wk3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 18:40:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752815AbXF3Wk3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 18:40:29 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:36804 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752467AbXF3Wk2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 18:40:28 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I4lc8-00027i-M0 for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 00:40:24 +0200 Received: from adsl-69-234-198-180.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([69.234.198.180]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 00:40:24 +0200 Received: from wa1ter by adsl-69-234-198-180.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 00:40:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-234-198-180.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 3.0a1pre (X11/20070630) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, walt wrote: > >> Linus Torvalds wrote: >>> I realize that a lot of people use the "git-xyzzy" format, and we have >>> various historical reasons for it... >> One of the historical reasons was to allow users of gnu interactive >> tools to delete the git wrapper script, as outlined in 'INSTALL'. ... > All this would be less of a problem if Git consisted only of builtins, > since you could easily do "mv git gitscm" then. *sigh* I just installed the gnu tools as a test (gentoo won't allow both gits to be installed at the same time, btw) and I found that each package installs one main 'git' along with a collection of other tools beginning with the prefix git. One major difference is that our git names them git-* while the gnu tools names them git*, so only the main 'git's conflict. The gnu 'git' can also be renamed and it still works. 'man git' might still be a problem.