From: "Kyle Moffett" <kyle@moffetthome.net>
To: "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Sam Vilain" <sam@vilain.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] deny push to current branch of non-bare repo
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:44:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f73f7ab80811111644y14f0e0ccweed44440356a6508@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081109014926.GA31276@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> The behavior is configurable via receive.denyCurrentBranch,
> defaulting to "warn" so as not to break existing setups
> (though it may, after a deprecation period, switch to
> "refuse" by default). For users who know what they are doing
> and want to silence the warning (e.g., because they have a
> post-receive hook that reconciles the HEAD and working
> tree), they can turn off the warning by setting it to false
> or "ignore".
Hmm, I wonder if it would be possible to also add a "detach" variant;
which would create a detached-HEAD at the current commit when
automatically receiving a push to the working branch. I have a
post-receive script that does so right now on a couple repositories.
It's still a little confusing to someone actively working in the
repository being pushed to, but it's much easier to explain than the
current default behavior.
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-12 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-07 22:07 [RFC PATCH 0/4] deny push to current branch of non-bare repo Jeff King
2008-11-07 22:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] t5400: expect success for denying deletion Jeff King
2008-11-09 10:38 ` Jan Krüger
2008-11-07 22:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] t5516: refactor oddball tests Jeff King
2008-11-07 22:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] tests: avoid pushing to current branch of non-bare repo Jeff King
2008-11-07 22:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] receive-pack: deny push " Jeff King
2008-11-07 22:39 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] " Mark Burton
2008-11-07 23:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-08 14:27 ` Jeff King
2008-11-08 15:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-08 20:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-09 1:49 ` Jeff King
2008-11-09 22:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-12 0:44 ` Kyle Moffett [this message]
2008-11-12 8:44 ` Jeff King
2008-11-13 5:22 ` Kyle Moffett
2008-11-13 5:37 ` Jeff King
2008-11-13 6:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-13 13:58 ` Kyle Moffett
2008-11-14 6:37 ` Jeff King
2008-12-02 2:22 ` Leo Razoumov
2008-12-02 2:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-02 2:41 ` Leo Razoumov
2008-12-02 2:48 ` Jeff King
2008-12-02 3:08 ` Leo Razoumov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f73f7ab80811111644y14f0e0ccweed44440356a6508@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kyle@moffetthome.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=sam@vilain.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).